March 21, 2010

  • Overweight? Depressed? Aged 35? …

    Yes.  yes.  And YES!  Fine.  I’m not depressed and I’m not goofing on those who potentially have a psychological disorder or just have found a way to draw attention to themselves.  This was the tag line for an article about characterizing and labeling “gamers.”  I just found it interesting because I fit two-of-the-three and before getting married I’d probably would label myself as a “gamer.”  But is being a “gamer” a bad thing (as opposed to being a “player”? =)  They only say playing video games could hinder reading skills and is linked to ADD

    Thinking about this some more is “gamer” this generations “nerd” or “geek”?  I’ve recently heard both of those words, as well as typical characterizations being used to refer to only those who are “geeky” or “nerdy” in a negative fashion.  Why are these characterizations seemingly done in a negative light?  Is it that bad to be a “nerd” or a “geek”?  The term “jock” can be thought of as both positive and negatively.  So why not “nerd” or “geek” or even “gamer”?  If anything these are the people that are gonna fix your computer or setup your DVR.  I was trying to come up with more name characterizations that lean more towards the liberal arts side but I really couldn’t come up with anything.  Only that if you say something negative about them, you may hurt their feelings.  It hurts when they boo. *snicker* 

Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *