Just The Facts, Ma’am …
How much do emotions play into your discussions or thoughts. A co-worker had sent me this article about how Federal pay is head of those in the private sector. Really? Typically it’s the other way around I first thought. If you read through the article what would you think? Do they have a valid article that truly shows Federal workings making more than those in the private sector and what would your reaction be to that? Well if you’re going for just the facts and trying to remove emotion, using past history one could come to the following conclusion: yes, currently there are some Federal employees who are making more than those in the private section.
The more interesting thing is why is that?
- Per the article: Office of Personnel Management spokeswoman Sedelta Verble, says higher pay also reflects the longevity and older age of federal workers. This is a key point. In general, government employees receive at least a 2% COLA increase each year (yes, I get this is probably more around 3-4% even though this past year I believe it was under 2%, but still) and you compound that on a salary over an extended period of time then an employee really could do well. As the article states there are a slew of employees who have been in the government for 20-40 years of service. Do you really see that type of longevity within the private sector? Not really. The long stability helps build ones salary within the government.
- The article is aiming for salary differences but one also needs to consider the amount of performance bonuses given between the two different employers. What is the difference between those two? Our agency does not give out bonuses whereas we know banking and financial institutions hand out huge bonuses. Does that help bridge the gap between the two?
- IMO, the key portion of the article that is dismissed is that the data is from 2008 – the height of the recession. Government salaries are not typically effected by such things whereas private sector salaries can be deeply impacted. Companies will cut salaries or employees who make too much money when the times are tough. Unemployment was between 7-15% for various states during 2008. It would be interesting to see what the salary difference is during the early and mid-2000′s when there was an economic boon. Private sector companies are more than willing to pay their employees during the good years but they must shrink salaries during the bad times.
So, all in all, it was an interesting article and it does show it does pay to work for the Federal Government. Sure you may not make a lot of money at first but over a long period of time there is the chance. It’s the risk and fast reward verse slow and gradual growth.
- Another good article to read and analyze about the Toyota hearing on Capitol Hill. Do you side with Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton or with Toyota? Emotions would just make you think that Norton is an idiot. Did she even understand the response from Toyota or was she just too emotionally involved since she owns a Camry Hybrid and wants a quick answer to show she has some intelligence. Wait. That’s not just emotion but FACT as well. For those who don’t troubleshoot problems or issues they tend to just want a quick answer and solution; even if the solution doesn’t actually fix the problem. I see this at work all the time. Something not working, just reboot the computer or pull the battery out. Is that really solving the problem and determining what causes the problem to begin with? Nope not really.
- I now have a craving for Cluck-U … too bad the one close to us closed down a few years ago.

- A Porsche hybrid that can do 62 mph in 3.2 seconds and get 78 mpg!
- Igdoof would be so proud. I still can’t believe they’re making a movie though.